ANTECEDENTS AND CONSEQUENCES OF INTENTION SUSTAINABLE CONSUMPTION BEHAVIOR WITH HEALTH CONSCIOUSNESS AS A MEDIATING VARIABLE
Keywords:
Social Responsibility, Collectivism, External Incentives, Intention Sustainable Consumption Sustainable Consumption BehaviorAbstract
This study was conducted to analyze the effect of Social Responsibility Collectivism, External Incentives on Intention Sustainable Consumption Intention, the impact of Intention Sustainable Consumption on Sustainable Consumption Behaviour, and the effect of Sustainable Consumption Behaviour on Sustainable Intention both directly and moderated by Health Awareness. The research design used is quantitative research with causality hypothesis testing. The sample used is respondents who carry out sustainable consumption activities. The sampling technique used was purposive sampling, and the sample used was 385. The data analysis used is SEM using AMOS software. The research findings show that social responsibility and external incentives have been proven to positively affect the intention of sustainable consumption. While Collectivism is not proven to have a positive effect on Intention Sustainable Consumption, Intention Sustainable Consumption is proven to have a positive effect on Sustainable Consumption Behavior, and Sustainable Consumption Behavior has a positive effect on Continuous Intention, but Health Consciousness is not proven to moderate the positive impact of Sustainable Consumption Behavior on Continuous Intention. The results of this study provide information that sustainable consumption activities must pay attention to the behavior of consumers related to social responsibility, external incentives, sustainable consumption intentions, and sustainable consumption behavior.
Downloads
References
P. B. de O. Claro & Esteves, N. R., “Sustainability-oriented strategy and Sustainable Development Goals,” Mark. Intell. Plan., vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 613–630, 2020, doi: 10.1108/MIP-08-2020-0365.
D. Jhamb, A. Chandel, A. Mittal, and U. Tandon, “Does the use of organic personal care products persuade sustainable consumption behaviour? Understanding the moderating role of health consciousness,” Young Consum., vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 807–830, 2023, doi: 10.1108/YC-01-2023-1668.
M. Khoiruman and M. Harsono, “Perluasan Theory of Planned Behavior dalam Penelitian Perilaku Hijau Expansion of Theory of Planned Behavior in Green Behavior Research,” ProBank, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 10–26, 2023, doi: 10.36587/probank.v8i1.1448.
F. sha Chou, C. C. Wang, M. C. Lai, C. H. Tung, Y. J. Yang, and K. H. Tsai, “Persuasiveness of organic agricultural products: Argument strength, health consciousness, self-reference, health risk, and perceived fear,” Br. Food J., vol. 122, no. 4, pp. 1289–1304, 2020, doi: 10.1108/BFJ-11-2019-0868.
M. Grimmer and R. Woolley, “The role of external incentives in sustainable consumption behavior,” J. Consum. Behav., vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 543–557, 2020.
M. Fatma and Z. Rahman, “Consumer behavior and sustainable consumption: The role of corporate social responsibility,” J. Strateg. Mark., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 234–245.
B. Pu, L. Zhang, Z. Tang, and Y. Qiu, “The relationship between health consciousness and home-based exercise in china during the covid-19 pandemic,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 17, no. 16, pp. 1–18, 2020, doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165693.
J. Singh, M. Kumar, and R. Agarwal, “Sustainability and consumer behavior: A motivational approach,” J. Consum. Behav., vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 308–320, 2020.
A. Kara and M. K. Min, “Gen Z consumers’ sustainable consumption behaviors: influencers and moderators,” Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 124–142, 2024, doi: 10.1108/IJSHE-08-2022-0263.
M. Matharu, R. Jain, and S. Kamboj, “Understanding the impact of lifestyle on sustainable consumption behavior: a sharing economy perspective,” Manag. Environ. Qual. An Int. J., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 20–40, 2021, doi: 10.1108/MEQ-02-2020-0036.
L. Muslimah and A. Muhyidin, “The role of knowledge, sustainable consumption promotion, and consumption intention for sustainable consumption behavior,” ProBisnis J. Manaj., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 60–70, 2024, doi: 10.62398/probis.v15i1.446.
Steg, L. and C. Vlek, “Encouraging sustainable consumption: The role of external incentives and social norms,” Environ. Psychol. Rev., vol. 46, pp. 74–88, 2021.
A. Amaliah Maisara, P., Waspada, S., & Armayani, A., “Sustainable Consumption Behavior in Indonesia: The Role of Environmental Concern, Perceived Consumer Effectiveness and Altruism,” J. Econ. Educ. Innov., vol. 13, p. 157, 2023, doi: 10.24036/011261450.
N. Rizkalla, “Determinants of Sustainable Consumption Behavior: An Examination of Consumption Values, PCE Environmental Concern and Environmental Knowledge,” Int. J. Soc. Sci. Humanit., pp. 48–54, 2018, doi: 10.18178/ijssh.2018.v8.932.
G. Sheng, F. Xie, S. Gong, and H. Pan, “The role of cultural values in green purchasing intention: Empirical evidence from Chinese consumers,” Int. J. Consum. Stud., vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 315–326, 2019, doi: 10.1111/ijcs.12513.
A. Zici, E. S. Quaye, D. C. Jaravaza, and Y. Saini, “Luxury purchase intentions: the role of individualism-collectivism, personal values and value-expressive influence in South Africa,” Cogent Psychol., vol. 8, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1080/23311908.2021.1991728.
E. A. de M. Watanabe, C. V. Torres, and S. Alfinito, “The impact of culture, evaluation of store image and satisfaction on purchase intention at supermarkets,” Rev. Gest., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 256–273, 2019, doi: 10.1108/REGE-12-2017-0009.
M. Y. Ansari and D. A. Siddique, “Effects of Culture on Green Purchase Intention, the Mediating Role of New Ecological Paradigm, Environmental Collective Efficacy and Environmental Knowledge,” Int. J. Ind. Mark., vol. 5, no. 1, p. 1, 2019, doi: 10.5296/ijim.v5i1.16002.
M. Hu, S. Jiang, and B. Huo, “The impacts of supply visibility and demand visibility on product innovation: the mediating role of supply chain integration,” Int. J. Logist. Manag., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 456–482, 2024, doi: 10.1108/IJLM-01-2021-0033.
W. Assoratgoon and S. Kantabutra, “Toward a sustainability organizational culture model,” J. Clean. Prod..
P. Ekins and D. Zenghelis, “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability,” Sustain. Sci., vol. 16, pp. 949–965, 2021.
E. Jakunskiene, “Assessment of the impact of social responsibility on poverty,” Sustain., vol. 13, no. 16, 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13169395.
T. T. Le, T. Le Thi Cam, N. Nguyen Thi, and V. Le Ngoc Phuong, “Do corporate social responsibility drive sustainable purchase intention? An empirical study in emerging economy,” Benchmarking An Int. J., Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1108/BIJ-05-2023-0346.
W. M. Hur and H. Kim, “The effects of corporate social responsibility on sustainable consumption intentions,” role Consum. Trust. Sustain., vol. 12, no. 8, 2020.
S. A. Westjohn, P. Magnusson, G. R. Franke, and Y. Peng, “Trust Propensity Across Cultures: The Role of Collectivism,” J. Int. Mark., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 2022, doi: 10.1177/1069031X211036688.
T. T. Le, T. Le Thi Cam, N. Nguyen Thi, and V. Le Ngoc Phuong, “Do corporate social responsibility drive sustainable purchase intention? An empirical study in emerging economy,” Benchmarking, 2024, doi: 10.1108/BIJ-05-2023-0346.
A. Kara, S. Patel, and L. Zhou, “No Title,” Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 221–235, 2024.
A. Kara & Min, M. K., “Gen Z consumers’ sustainable consumption behaviors: influencers and moderators,” Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 124–142, 2024, doi: 10.1108/IJSHE-08-2022-0263.
J. N. Sheth and N. K. Sethia, “The role of external incentives in promoting sustainable consumption,” J. Bus. Res., pp. 310–321, 2019.
P. Halder, E. N. Hansen, J. Kangas, and T. Laukkanen, “How national culture and ethics matter in consumers’ green consumption values,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 265, p. 121754, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121754.
T. Entina, I. Karabulatova, A. Kormishova, M. Ekaterinovskaya, and M. Troyanskaya, “Tourism industry management in the global transformation: Meeting the needs of generation z,” Polish J. Manag. Stud., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 130–148, 2021, doi: 10.17512/pjms.2021.23.2.08.
M. Matharu Jain, R., & Cambodia, S., “Understanding the impact of lifestyle on sustainable consumption behavior: a sharing economy perspective,” Manag. Environ. Qual. An Int. J., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 20–40, 2021, doi: 10.1108/MEQ-02-2020-0036.
J. Lee and H. Lee, “The effect of external incentives on sustainable consumption intention: A multi-country study.,” J. Environ. Psychol., 2022.
J. S. Benson, J. S. Aker, and F. Raza, “Social values and sustainable consumption: Understanding consumer behavior,” Environ. Psychol., vol. 69, pp. 117–127, 2020.
J. M. Riley and R. Klein, “How logistics capabilities offered by retailers influence millennials’ online purchasing attitudes and intentions,” Young Consum., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 131–151, 2019, doi: 10.1108/YC-12-2018-0889.
Y. Xue et al., “Mediating effect of health consciousness in the relationship of lifestyle and suboptimal health status: A cross-sectional study involving Chinese urban residents,” BMJ Open, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 1–8, 2020, doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039701.
F. Chou, C.-C. Wang, M.-C. Lai, C.-H. Tung, Y.-J. Yang, and K.-H. Tsai, “Persuasiveness of organic agricultural products,” Br. Food J., vol. 122, no. 4, pp. 1289–1304, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1108/BFJ-11-2019-0868.
D. Jhamb Chandel, A., Mittal, A., & Tandon, U., “Does the use of organic personal care products persuade sustainable consumption behaviour? Understanding the moderating role of health consciousness,” Young Consum., vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 807–830, 2023, doi: 10.1108/YC-01-2023-1668.
J. F. Hair, J. J. Risher, M. Sarstedt, and C. M. Ringle, “When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM,” Eur. Bus. Rev., vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 2–24, 2019, doi: 10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203.
