The Effectiveness and Efficiency of the Mini Vise Manufacturing Process Practicum: A Technical and Non-Technical Perspective on the Practicum
Keywords:
Aspek Teknis, Aspek Non-Teknis, Praktikum Proses ManufakturAbstract
This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of both technical and non-technical aspects in the mini vise manufacturing process practicum at technical education institutions. Data was collected through questionnaires distributed to 138 respondents, consisting of students who participated in the practicum. The questionnaire measured various technical aspects such as meeting schedules, punctuality, clarity of information, consistency in delivery, and problem-solving, as well as non-technical aspects such as teaching methods, the role of practicum assistants, module content-reports, teaching and learning activities, and learning outcomes.
The results indicate that, in terms of technical aspects, the majority of respondents agreed that meeting schedules (64.1%), clarity of information (68.1%), and problem-solving (77.9%) were carried out effectively, although punctuality still requires improvement, with 39.1% of respondents remaining neutral. Regarding non-technical aspects, teaching methods (81.2%), the quality of practicum assistants (81.9%), and teaching activities (81.2%) received positive assessments from most respondents. However, some areas still need further attention to improve consistency and overall respondent satisfaction.
The main conclusion of this study is that the mini vise manufacturing process practicum has generally been effective and efficient, although there are several aspects that require improvement, particularly in terms of punctuality and consistency in delivery. Recommendations from this study include improving time management, enhancing the clarity of information, and providing further training for practicum assistants.
Downloads
References
Abdullah, M., & Yusoff, M. (2016). Pengaruh Metode Pembelajaran Aktif dalam Pendidikan Teknik. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik, VIII(2), 121-133.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. In Helms, M. M. (Ed.), Handbook of Research Methods in Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Sage Publications.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Fine, D. (2013). Effective Laboratory Practice Management in Engineering Education. Journal of Engineering Education, CII(1), 25-31.
Halim, A., Naim, M., & Syamsul, H. (2018). Effectiveness of Hybrid Learning in Technical Vocational Education and Training (TVET). Journal of Technical Education and Training, X(2), 135-144.
Halim, A., Naim, M., & Syamsul, H. (2018). Pembelajaran Hybrid dalam Pendidikan Vokasi Teknik. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan, XI(2), 135-144.
Hanif, M., Rahmadani, R., & Widyastuti, M. (2017). Peran Asisten Praktikum dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Pembelajaran Teknik. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Teknologi, XII(1), 89-101.
Jackson, P. (2015). Enhancing Information Clarity in Engineering Laboratory Sessions. IEEE Transactions on Education, LVIII(3), 210-215.
Jones, M., & Lau, A. (2017). Interactive Learning Methods for Enhanced Student Engagement. Journal of STEM Education, XVIII(3), 12-19.
Lee, J. (2015). Improving Information Delivery in Engineering Labs. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, XVIII(2), 153-163.
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. Jossey-Bass.
Mujtaba, T., & Reiss, M. (2016). Active Learning in Engineering Labs: A Case Study. European Journal of Engineering Education, XLI(4), 448-461.
Nazier, M. (2013). Metode Penelitian. Ghalia Indonesia.
Nguyen, T. (2016). Optimizing Laboratory Time: A Scheduling Approach. IEEE Access, 4, 3774-3781.
Patton, M.Q. (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Pinto, M. F., Souza, V. A., & Lopes, L. F. (2012). Evaluation of Laboratory Practice in Engineering: Challenges and Best Practices. IEEE Transactions on Education, LX(4), 583-590.
Rahman, A., & Sani, S. (2016). Efektivitas Pembelajaran Teknik Melalui Lab Interaktif. Jurnal Teknik Mesin Indonesia, IX(1), 45-55.
Rahmi, H., & Hartati, S. (2018). Evaluasi Pembelajaran Laboratorium Teknik Mesin Menggunakan Pendekatan Kualitatif. Jurnal Teknik Mesin, X(1), 67-79.
Rosli, M., Mustafa, H., & Rahman, M. (2015). Implementasi Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek di Pendidikan Teknik. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, VI(3), 218-224.
Sami, R., Utami, I., & Wulandari, R. (2019). Pemanfaatan Teknologi Digital dalam Manajemen Waktu Praktikum. Jurnal Teknologi dan Pendidikan, XIV(4), 355-367.
Sudrajat, A., & Hidayat, Z. (2020). Evaluasi Kinerja Asisten Praktikum di Laboratorium Pendidikan Teknik. Jurnal Teknik Mesin, XIX(3), 145-157.
Sutrisno, B., & Indrawati, A. (2018). Pengembangan Modul Pembelajaran di Laboratorium Teknik. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik Mesin, XIII(4), 215-227.
Trianto, F., & Suprapto, W. (2016). Strategi Penyampaian Materi Praktikum yang Efektif dalam Pendidikan Teknik. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran Teknik Mesin, XI(2), 76-85.
Wong, L., & Chiu, T. (2017). Consistency in Laboratory Material Delivery: Challenges and Solutions. Procedia Engineering, 172, 182-189.
Wang, K., Wu, Y., & Feng, Z. (2020). Integrating Technical and Non-Technical Skills in Engineering Labs: An Outcome-Based Approach. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, XXIII(4), 105-120.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
